Category: Research · Version:
0.0.1 · Author: opendirectory · Compatibility: All targets (claude, codex, opencode, gemini, anti-gravity, openclaw, hermes)Install
- npx CLI (Recommended)
- skills.sh
- Claude Code Native
- Claude Desktop
- Manus AI
What It Does
- Fetches the product URL via Firecrawl (handles JS-rendered SPAs) or Tavily extract as fallback
- Detects funding stage from CTA signals on the page (waitlist, free trial, pricing, sales CTAs)
- Maps a 3-level industry taxonomy (L1 > L2 > L3) from the product page
- Curated pre-match (Step 5b): Scores product against a verified dataset of 25 VC funds (sourced from fund websites) — instant zero-hallucination matches with no Tavily credits consumed
- Discovers comparable companies: Curated portfolio companies from matched funds + Tavily live search for L3-niche specifics
- Track A: 5 Tavily searches to find who invested in each comparable company
- Track B: 3 Tavily searches to find VCs who publish investment theses about this specific niche
- Synthesizes and ranks all found VCs — curated matches labeled “verified”, Tavily matches labeled by track
- Produces top 5 deep-dives with fund overview, portfolio evidence, how-to-approach, and outreach hook
- Generates 3 product-specific outreach hooks (not generic advice)
- Saves output to
docs/vc-intel/[product]-[date].md
data/vc_funds.json dataset (sourced from fund websites) or (b) a specific Tavily search result. The AI does not draw from training knowledge for any factual claim.
Requirements
Tavily is required. Firecrawl is recommended — without it, Tavily extract is used as fallback (may miss JS-rendered content).
Setup
How to Use
Why Two Tracks
Track A (portfolio mapping): VCs who already wrote a check in your space. These investors have proven they understand the category, the risks, and the buyer. They need less convincing than a generalist fund. Track B (thesis matching): VCs who are actively publishing about your space. An investor who wrote a 2,000-word blog post about why they want to invest in CI/CD tooling is actively looking for deals. Your cold email lands in a much warmer inbox. Generic “VCs in B2B SaaS” lists skip both signals. This skill produces only VCs with named evidence for each entry.Output
Each run produces:- Product analysis: detected industry taxonomy, stage, ICP, comparable companies used
- Track A table: VCs who backed comparable companies (with evidence)
- Track B table: VCs with published theses about this space (with source)
- Top 5 deep-dives: fund overview, why it fits, portfolio in space, how to approach, outreach hook
- 3 outreach hooks: product-specific openers for cold outreach
Cost per Run
- Firecrawl: ~$0.001 per fetch
- Tavily: 10 searches at ~0.10 (2 comparable discovery + 5 Track A + 3 Track B)
- Curated pre-match (Step 5b): $0.00 — local scoring against
data/vc_funds.json, no API calls - Total: ~$0.10 per run

